Intelligent quote of the day

zachariasr.jpg

“First…it’s important to understand that Christianity is not the only religion that  claims exclusivity—not just theologically, but also linguistically. Muslims believe that the sole, sufficient, and consummate miracle of Islam is the Koran. They say, however, it’s only recognizable in Arabic, and that any translation desacralizes it. And it’s not just a basic understanding of Arabic that’s required, but a sophisticated knowledge of the language. As for Buddhism, it was born when Gautama Buddha rejected two fundamental asertions of Hinduism—the ultimate authority of the Vedas, which are their scriptures, and the caste system. Hinduism itself is absolutely uncompromising on two or three issues: the law of karma, which is the law of moral cause and effect, so that every rebirth that makes recompense for the previous life; the authority of the Vedas; and reincarnation….[on Hinduism being a very tolerant faith]…“When you hear that statement, don’t take it at face value…What it really means is that Hinduism allows you to practice your religion so long as it buys into their notion of truth, which is syncretistic…As for Sikhism…it came as a challenge to both Hinduism and Buddhism. Then there are atheiss—they reject the viewpoints of thos who believe in God. and even Baha’ism, which claims to be a cosmic embrace of all religions, ends up excluding the exclusivists! Therefore, the statement that Christians are arrogant by claiming exclusivity ignores the reality that every other major religion does as well.  So when people talk of arrogance, this cannot be a logical attack they are making.”

 Ravi Zacharias in Lee Strobel’s book The Case for Faith, refuting long-time and unchallenged strong assertions that Christianity is arrogant because of it’s exclusivity

Advertisements

2 thoughts on “Intelligent quote of the day

  1. As always, Ravi Zacharias states this brilliantly. What a great comparison, and exposing of false assertions against the Christian faith. Exclusivity does not always imply “arrogance.” That is probably my biggest contention with an assertion like this.

    Thank you!

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s